"Streetless Streetness" is a Cairo-based investigative think-tank initiated by a group of Egyptian architects and designers, began their activities by a series of interventions in Al Mo'ez street, Cairo, with a core question about how "streetful" are our streets?
"Streetless Streetness" is concerned with urban transformations, dynamics of public spaces, with a focus on promoting Cairo's design scene and building public interest in possible urban interventions in Cairo.
By: Mohamad Abotera and Marwan Fayed
When the Egyptian government decided to upgrade the Mo’ez street in historical Cairo, the upgrade project assumed a difference between the street and its surrounding neighbourhood. This was manifested in a sharp border line on both sides of the street where the upgrade project appears in between then disappears abruptly outside. The Detonator was designed to discuss this border line by investigating its meanings to the institution and all other users as well as studying the power dynamics there.
Our approach was to materialize the border line by giving it substance. On doing so we tried to reflect possible perceptions about such border using elements from the surroundings and so we chose to build a gateway; as gateways were historically built on such locations. By nature, gateways are vectors that hint towards the space it gates which is the neglected areas in our case. The design of the gateway tried to imitate the renovation plan concept which paid much more attention to the facade; and so we were keen to show a contrast between both sides of the gateway where the Moéz face is neat and tidy while the back face looks deteriorated and corroded. The building material of choice was one that is perceived by the institution as inappropriate and this is why it was always pushed back and away from the street among other elements of daily life. Hence, we built the gateway from potato chips crackers boxes. This would have been enough to make a point and set a statement, yet we still needed an interactive installation so that we can measure and investigate the power dynamics of all present entities of the street. So, we filled the boxes with crackers to make it more appealing/provocative.
The Detonator project was for the local users a sort of a show and a direct benefit. In the construction phase people gathered around us watching and wondering how they can benefit from this. After completion a phase of replacement took place, where people started watching the gateway instead of us and looked forward for the crackers which left them in an energizing state. As for the institution represented in +20 organisers and the police they were less concerned as far as the installation is ready for the event. After the event was officially opened we stopped to deter people from taking crackers however we didn’t encourage them to. This was enough as a notice for the locals to ignite the detonator in a violent action that exceeded our expectations leading to the disappearing of 600 boxes and 3000 crackers pack in less than 6 minutes. Locals never seemed to care about the event or art or display; nothing more than the taste of free crackers. The event organizers were left in shock and panic; first they tried to save the installation but the crowds and the surprise were more than they can compete against so they switched positions suddenly and started destructing the detonator as well. The only difference was that they were trying to end that mess to maintain the event’s look and not to treat their taste buds. Six minutes later all boxes were taken away and eaten, the explosion site was cleaned, the border line was quite again, system was restored and another explosion was contained.
by Adham Selim
Over the last 20 years the Egyptian cities -especially Cairo- witnessed major shifts, jump cuts, fast forwards on the temporal scale. Globalization, fast assimilation of modern tele-communication -satellite, mobile phones, broad band internet, etc.- speeded up the way events shape and take place.
While on one hand these changes were deeply transformative, widely spreadable to the extent that major social events and habits almost disappeared or replaced by others in a very short span of time, on the other, city spaces were lingering in the background, slow-paced behind the major shifts in the envelope of time.
New events were rushing by to invade the old spaces, and they could hardly show any patience for these spaces to evolve naturally, what resulted in a sort of lapse, a gap between space and event evolution processes, millions of events become to take place in certain city spaces with no connection to these spaces.
“Filling The Gap” is an experimental exploration inside this fertile gap between “space” and “time” evolution processes, in an attempt to come up with a genuine answer for the dilemma of the “Streetless Streetness”.
Instead of having an installation in 3-dinemsional space, “Filling The Gap” rather takes its form in the dimension of time : temporarily inhibiting the mobility of pedestrians by cutting their connection with their own reference systems, and confronting them with situations they have to think and take decisions about.
Essentially the installation is destined to work at night time, when Al Mo’ez street is at its peak operation mode, it uses artificial clouds produced by ordinary smoke machines, deployed remotely enough no to be seen, the clouds are given volume by green light fixtures distributed along the probable perimeter of the cloud, the green cloud of smoke is a connection to the green neon lights significant to Cairo’s mosques, and the fumes of the old-style scents used to be burnt to give blessings to holy places around Al Mo’ez.

The green cloud is meant to function as a visual buffer, that should isolate people from their momentarily connection with context, thus holding them back from acquiring information from their surrounds, and once they’re into the cloud, they would be faced by a green mat (Hasseer) – traditionally-made mats used for grand prayers in Egypt, mostly green- blocking the width of the pedestrian lane, the long historical connection between “Hasseer” and the sanctity of the Muslim prayer -Muslims are not allowed to tread on prayers mat with shoes- would involve here as an instant decision-making criterion, what forces pedestrians into a process of exploration of the physical setting that they used to pass-by everyday, seeing it with new perception.
Re-framing -or maybe re-phrasing!- Al Mo’ez through such a new visual experience proposes a missing spatial dimension in people’s daily life, and their information acquisition processes, strong connection between “Value” and “Event” appears to be the map-generator in people’s life, even in a very historically-lush context like Al Mo’ez, people would justify their means to prioritize value/event over space, this what might be a direct reason for seeing extreme examples of satellite dishes over slums, or 3G-mobile phones in houses with no drinking water…!
Pedestrians decisions and choices in “Filling the Gap” – whether they chose to tread on the green mat in a blind chase after ”Value”, or just got around it and gave the space a new definition, whether their reactions were primitively concerned with the instant associations between sanctity and the green mat, or were they speaking of a much higher degree of understanding that sanctity is not necessarily attached to the material – whatever might be the remarks, it would help create a socio-spatial map that decides on how the streetness of Cairo is streetless (or maybe streetful!), this is what might happen on one hand, while on the other, the installation would raise political questions about how public spaces are addressed by the community, what’s perceived and what’s not, and how does an addressed public space perception differ from its physical setting.
Photography: Radwa Omar & Adham Selim
ملء الفجوة
خلال العشرين سنة الماضية شهدت المدينة في مصر – و خصوصا القاهرة – تغيرات كبيرة , قفزات متوالية , و حركة متسارعة إلى الأمام على مسطرة الزمن بدت كشريط فيديو تتحرك الصور فيه بسرعة جنونية . العولمة و الاستيعاب السريع لمظاهر التقنية الحديثة من أطباق الأقمار الصناعية و أجهزة التليفون الخلوي و الإنترنت فائق السرعة أسهمت في إسراع وتيرة حدوث الأشياء و غيرت من طريقة حدوثها. اااا
و في حين كانت تلك التغيرات عميقة الأثر و سريعة الانتشار في فضاء المدينة و ما حولها , إلى الحد الذي أسهم في تغيير ثوابت اجتماعية و أعراف و عادات متفق عليها أو استبدالها بأعراف و عادات و ثقافات جديدة في فترة محدودة من الزمن , كان الوجود المادي لفضاء المدينة يلهث محاولا اللحاق بهذه التغيرات , بطيء الخطوات بحكم طبيعته التي تحتاج الكثير من الوقت و الجهد للتغيير. اااا
بشكل مفاجيء امتلأت الفضاءات القديمة بأحداث جديدة , بسرعة لم يستطع فضاء المدينة القديم ملاحقتها , لم ينمو فضاء المدينة المعاصرة بشكل طبيعي , كانت وتيرة الأحداث أسرع من قدرته على الاستيعاب , بدا كل شيء كأنه تعجيل هرموني سريع خلق فجوة بين الفضاء و الحدث و طريقة تغير كل منهما , الارتباط الوثيق بين الإثنين و هو ما يخلق التجربة الحضرية لم يعد موجودا. اااا
ملء الفجوة” هو استكشاف تجريبي داخل هذه الفجوة الخصبة بين “الحدث” و “فضاء المدينة”, و هو محاولة لفهم طبيعة إشكالية “(لا)شارعية الشارع” و الوصول لإجابة على ما تطرحه من أسئلة. اااا
بدلا من أن يكون مجرد تكوين فضائي آخر في الأبعاد الثلاثة , يتخذ “ملء الفجوة” من بعد الزمن مكانا لتواجده: إعاقة لحظية لقدرة المارة على الحركة , من خلال عزلهم بشكل مؤقت عن الاتصال مع محيطهم , و مجابهتهم بموقف فضائي يجب أن يتخذوا قرارا حياله. اااا
بشكل أساسي سيعمل المشروع ليلا , حين يكون شارع المعز مزدحما , تبدأ التجربة بسحابة صناعية من الدخان تنطلق من مكان غير مرئي للمارة في الشارع , السحابة ستكون مضاءة بمصابيح نيون خضراء موزعة على المحيط المحتمل للسحابة في استقراء لخصائص المكان البصرية : المصابيح النيون الخضراء المميزة لمآذن القاهرة و الدخان المميز للبخور الذي عادة ما يستخدم لجلب البركة في الأبنية الدينية في شارع المعز و في غيره هي بعض العلامات المميزة لتجربة المكان. اااا
من المفترض أن تقوم السحابة الخضراء بوظيفة عازل بصري , يفصل المارة لحظيا عن محيط المكان , و بالتالي يمنعهم من استقبال أية معلومات يمكنهم التحرك بناءا عليها بشكل مؤقت , تصبح حركة الناس حينها لا إرادية و حدسية , حينها تتم مواجهتهم بسجادة صلاة خضراء كبيرة “حصير” - نوع من السجاد يصنع محليا في مصر للصلاة , غالبا أخضر اللون – , هنا يعمل الاتصال الذهني التاريخي بين اللون الأخضر و السجادة و قدسية الصلاة كمحرك أساسي للفعل – لا يسمح للمسلمين و لغيرهم بالمرور بأحذيتهم فوق السجاد المخصص للصلاة – و هو ما سيدفع المارة للدخول في استكشاف ذاتي للتكوين المادي الجديد الذي طرأ على الفضاء القديم الذي اعتادوا المرور خلاله يوميا , سيرون الفضاء نفسه و لكن بعين جديدة. اااا
إعادة صياغة شارع المعز خلال هذه التحربة البصرية يطرح بعدا فضائيا مفقتدا في حياة الناس اليومية و في طريقة تحصيلهم للمعلومات , الاتصال القوي بين “القيمة” و “الحدث” في حياة الناس في مصر يبدو و كأنه العنصر الفعال في تشكيل انطباعاتهم الذهنية عن أنفسهم و عن المدينة , حتى في محيط تاريخي خصب مثل شارع المعز , يبدو أن الناس – بسبب افتقادهم لهذا البعد الفضائي – أصبحت لديهم القدرة على تمرير ما يحلو لهم لتأصيل و إعلاء فكر القيمة \ الحدث فوق الفضاء , و هو ما يجعلنا في بعض الأحيان نرى تلك النماذج المخيفة من أطباق الأقمار الصناعية فوق مبان عشوائية و أجهزة اتصال خلوي من الجيل الثالث في بيوت بلا مياه نظيفة للشرب…! اااا
إختيارات المارة في تجربة “ملء الفجوة” سواء اختاروا أن يدهسوا بأقدامهم سجادة الصلاة الخضراء في سباق نحو القيمة أو تجنبوها و أكسبوا الفضاء تعريفا جديدا من خلال دورانهم من حوله , سواء كانت ردود أفعالهم متمركزة حول ارتباطات الصورة الذهنية للحصير الأخضر بالقداسة أو كانت ردود أفعالهم ناطقة بوعي بأن الوقت و المكان ليسا مكان أو وقت صلاة , و أن القدسية غير مرتبطة بالضرورة بمادية الأشياء , أي كانت الملاحظات فإنها ستكشف بعضا من جوانب إشكالية “(لا)شارعية الشارع” , كما أنها قد تجيب عن أسئلة حول كيفية تعريف الفضاء بواسطة المستخدمين , ما الذي يتم إدراكه من الفضاء , و كيف يختلف الفضاء المدرك عن الفضاء في صورته المادية؟ اااا
Resilience refers to the capacity of an individual or community to cope with stress, overcome adversity or adapt positively to change. The ability to bounce back from negative experiences may reflect the innate qualities of individuals or be the result of learning and experience. Regardless of the origin of resilience, there is evidence to suggest that it can be developed and enhanced to promote greater wellbeing. Resilience is not regarded as a quality that is either present or absent in a person or group but rather a process, which may vary across circumstances and time.
The work is a reflection on how the formal efforts of planners attempts to mask the city, yet the notion of resilience simply breaks-down under the pressure of cultural norms that are more than often stronger than the written law. The work thus tested the tendency of a dynamic community to acquire space as a resilience action towords a static system. The instillation is a flexible interactive space, defined by light moveble walls where the user walk into the space and have the freedom to reset, expand and extend the space to attain a desirable space for himself, but without trespassing the margin which was in my case, the pavement. Different settings were mapped by documenting from the process to the final design by taking shots for the space itself and public space surrounding it.
Each user was totally free to adjust, extend and acquire space to accommodate his/her needs of space by pushing cardboard Partition from inside. Extending the space accordingly affected the street space, so street user – as a reaction – pushed back the partitions into the inner space again.
This three armed relation between the order I put, the user from inside and the street user outside was my interest. The mapping reflected user’s attepts to acquire a public space and turn in into private, where user interacted with the space as an owner for a couple of minutes. Most of the users pushed all partitions to be fully streched structure, breaking the pavement margin. The structure acquired 20% of El Moez Street and 40% of Borgwan’s way, which affected the street flow, specially in rush hours. Surprisingly most of street passers got stuck in the bottle’s neck which the structure formed. Passers reacted with this very light structure as if it is a stone structure which can’t be moved although the wind is always giving a slight motion to the partitions. But with a time interval of about every one hour, one of the passers gets angry with the affect of the structure on the street, pushing it all inside again.
Results of mapping showed that in such a space where the authority is very strong because of the street identity turned to be a touristic area, community resilience is very weak, accepting any ununderstandable structure and be very aware to not approach it. Decay of the structure was another interesting result to state my point, where the structure was destroyed from the inner partitions, while partitions facing el Moez street, were totally safe.
Barriers are everywhere around Cairo directing people where and how to behave; containing people as if they were some sort of contamination; imprisoning green spaces as if it needs protection.
Is there any sort of resilience against these forces and barriers? According to Crawford Stanley Holling: ‘[Resilience is] the capacity of a system to absorb and utilize or even benefit from perturbations and changes that attain it, and so to persist without a qualitative change in the system’s structure.’ Are the people growing “ir-resilient” and negative towards the culture of control around us?!
These questions and a lot others were behind this installation in al-Moez Street. The objective of this installation were to discover how the people are to react if a seating place were made more attractive for sitting using greenery but Then people were blocked from sitting there using a number of barriers made of modular, unglued PVC pipes colored in stripes, resembling those we see all over Cairo.
It’s noticed there is a dialectic relationship between the Barrier and the Guard, each one of them needs the other to function. In the case of the installation the barriers were deprived of their guards and in spite of this there were very few attempts to cross these barriers except for children who actually considered it were their private playing zone. In the matter of fact they took good care of the Barriers!
Are we, “grown-ups”, becoming both the suppressor as well as being suppressed?! Are we completing the role of the guardian of the barrier even if the person is absent?
The installation was dismantled as the children were playing with and around it; actually it was being not glued to give margin for this possibility. The children in the process of erecting it back, for my surprise, transforming it into two full sized goals and used the lawn as a playground to play on football. Can the barriers we face everywhere, everyday all around Cairo be turned one day by the hands of the people into something of use to them ?!
A. Borham
الممنوع
الحواجز حولنا في كل مكان في القاهرة , توجه وتحكم تصرفات الناس, تحيط بهم كأنهم مرض معدي, تحاصر الحدائق كما لو كانت تحتاج لمن يحميها من الناس. أليس هناك نوع من رد الفعل تجاه هذه الحواجز؟ هل أصبحنا سلبيين تجاة ثقافة التحكم و الممنوع؟
تلك الأسئلة وغيرها كانت الدافع وراء هذا التكوين الفراغى المقام بشارع المعز في قلب القاهرة القديمة. يهدف هذا التكوين للكشف عن كيفية تعامل الناس مع مكان للجلوس علي الرصيف إذا ما تمت زيادة جاذبيته عن طريق استخدم التشجير ثم تم منع الناس من استخدامه بواسطة حواجز مركبة من المواسير الـبلاستيكية الملونة, تشبه تلك التى نقابلها فى أنحاء القاهرة
من الملاحظ أنه هناك نوع من العلاقة التبادلية بين الحاجز و الحارس القائم عليه. إن أحدهما لا يستطيع تأدية وظيفته بدون وجود اللأخر. بالرغم من أن الحواجز المستخدمة فى التكوين لم يكن عليها حارس ليمنع الناس, إلا أنه لم تسجل خلال فترة وجود التكوين إلا محاولات قليلة لتجاوزها باستثناء الأطفال الذين تعاملوا معها على أنها منطقة خاصة بهم فقط. هل أصبحنا نحن “الكبار” المانعين فضلا عن كوننا الممنوعين؟ هل أصبحنا نقوم بدور حارس الحاجز حتى في غيابه؟
تحولت الحواجز إلى مجموعة من المواسير الملقاه أرضا نتيجة للعب الأطفال بها كما كان من المتوقع ولذلك لم تلصق ببعضها البعض لترك مساحة لحدوث ذلك. خلال محاولة الأطفال إعادة تركيب الحواجز تحولت الى مرميان كرة القدم بالحجم الطبيعى و استخدمت الحشائش كأرضية للملعب الخاص بهم. هل يمكن فى يوم من الايام أن تتحول الحواجز التى تحيط بنا فى كل مكان الى شىء مفيد؟
أحمد برهام














